+1 2149 811 707
Harry Potter
As we leap into a world of medieval primitive weapons, there are perhaps few swords worth fawning over as much as the Bastard Sword and Claymore. These two symbolic weapons have not only found their place in the annals of history, but are also present in the history of video games and even acquire heroic proportions. But the reality often differs from the fantasy as represented in games. In this post, we’ll explore the real history of the Bastard Sword and the Claymore, and see how well these weapons fit into the world in bioware games. So whether you’re a lover of history or a sucker for video games, this comparison will shed light on these legendary swords, or rather try to compare them in a more realistic manner.
What is a Bastard Sword?
Historical Context
The Bastard Sword, also known as a hand-and-a-half sword, dates back to the late Middle Ages (13th to 16th centuries). This sword was highly versatile, allowing users to wield it with one hand for speed or two hands for power and control. Its blade usually measured between 90-110 cm (35-43 inches) and weighed between 1.5 to 2.5 kg (3.3 to 5.5 pounds).
The term “Bastard” refers to its hybrid nature—neither a one-handed sword nor a two-handed greatsword, but something in between. Knights and soldiers favored it for its adaptability in combat. It provided reach and power without the heavy weight of a full two-handed sword.
The Bastard Sword in Gaming Lore
In gaming, developers often portray the Bastard Sword as a versatile, well-rounded weapon, making it ideal for warriors seeking flexibility on the battlefield. Popular titles like Dark Souls and The Elder Scrolls franchise often depict the Bastard Sword as a reliable. balanced weapon with moderate damage and reach. Games preserve the Bastard Sword’s reputation for adaptability in virtual worlds. but they often exaggerate the specific dynamics of its handling for dramatic effect.
Many games, however, overlook the crucial techniques historically needed to wield the sword effectively. Gaming mechanics often simplify the skill required to transition between one- and two-handed use. Reducing the Bastard Sword to just another weapon for hacking and slashing through enemies.
What is a Claymore?
Historical Context
The Claymore, a highly effective close-combat weapon, originates from traditional Scottish arms design and saw widespread use between the 15th and 17th centuries. Derived from the Gaelic word meaning “large sword,” the Claymore featured a long, straight blade, typically measuring 120-140 cm (47-55 inches). Its distinctive hilt, with broad arms sloping downward, added to its formidable presence. This combination of length and design made the Claymore a deadly weapon on the battlefield, symbolizing power and strength in combat. Similar to the Bastard Sword, the Claymore was primarily wielded with two hands. Its bulk and weight nearly ranged to about 2 to 2.5 kg (4.4 to 5.5 lbs.) making it more frightening for Scots warriors who gracefully used it to slice and dice others in a horizontal fashion. Throughout Medieval Scotland, the Claymore was much more than a weapon; it represented a vehicle of dignity and influence over an entire clan.
The Claymore in Gaming Lore
In gaming, developers often depict the Claymore as a massive, slow. And heavy sword that delivers high damage but sacrifices speed. Titles like Final Fantasy, Monster Hunter. And Dark Souls tend to exaggerate its size and power, making it a favored choice for players prioritizing damage over agility. Historical fighters needed skill and precision to handle the real Claymore, despite it being a formidable weapon. In contrast, games often reduce it to a “brute force” weapon, downplaying the technique involved.
Real History vs. Gaming Lore: Key Differences
When comparing the real history of the Bastard Sword. And Claymore with their depictions in gaming, a few key differences stand out:
Size and Weight: In games, both the Bastard Sword and Claymore are often shown to be much larger than they were historically. This exaggeration is likely for visual impact, but it removes the historical context where swords needed to balance weight and maneuverability.
Combat Technique: Historically, wielding a Bastard Sword or Claymore required significant training and skill. In gaming, the focus is more on dealing damage rather than the intricacies of swordplay. Games often reduce the technique of switching between one- and two-handed grips on a Bastard Sword. Or executing the precise sweeping movements of a Claymore, to simple button presses.
Speed vs. Power: Games tend to simplify the trade-off between speed and power. In reality, the Bastard Sword was a balanced weapon, while the Claymore demanded deliberate, powerful strikes. In gaming, developers often exaggerate these dynamics. Portraying the Bastard Sword as a “jack-of-all-trades” weapon that offers balanced speed and power. Meanwhile, they depict the Claymore as a slow, high-damage behemoth that prioritizes brute force over agility.
 The Bastard Sword vs. Claymore: History and Gaming Roles
The Bastard Sword and Claymore, both iconic weapons, served different roles in history and gaming. Historically, the Bastard Sword was versatile, usable with one or two hands. while the Claymore symbolized raw power and strength on the battlefield. In gaming, these swords represent player choice between balance and brute force. Understanding their real history enriches appreciation for medieval combat and deepens their significance in gaming. Next time you choose one in an RPG, remember the centuries of history behind them.